Thread:Norleon/@comment-1784397-20130902215243/@comment-3261234-20130904223044

Let us talk about it a bit more: I compared our current version with that of the Narutopedia (where I sometimes upload some images). Let's take for an anime and  for a manga comparison. As you see, the "Source" and the "Portion of copyrighted work used" differ a bit. Maybe we should be more precise when talking about the source (like "K-ON! Manga Volume 2" instead of just "K-ON Manga"). The "K-ON! by Kakifly" could be put under the "Other Information" section just as the NP does it. The "Portion of copyrighted work used" thing is currently wrong as we have it since we should name the method of how we got our hands on the image and where it originally comes from.

You can trust me when I say that most of the members of the Narutopedia are obsessed with making no faults when it is about images. My talkpage history is full of reprimands and orders. xD